The relationship that needs scrutiny is usually the supplier.
Who owns the company, who stands behind it, whether anyone connected to it appears on a sanctions or PEP list, and whether anything has changed since the contract was awarded.
Public bodies need a consistent and defensible way to assess suppliers and other counterparties. IQON brings screening, ownership information, structured review and evidence into one process that can be examined later.
Nordvest Teknikk AS
Framework review
Who owns the company, who stands behind it, whether anyone connected to it appears on a sanctions or PEP list, and whether anything has changed since the contract was awarded.
The same checks, in the same order, on every third party — regardless of who runs the process.
What was examined and what was found, visible rather than held by an individual.
Every decision carries a named person and the reasoning behind it.
Multi-participant review and approval, sequenced with owners and deadlines.
Monitoring continues after award, not only during procurement.
A defensible account, available when the decision is examined later.
A supplier can change during the life of a contract. Ownership, board members, beneficial owners, sanctions status and other risk factors may all change after the initial review.
IQON helps keep the supplier relationship current through:
ownership and UBO visibility
PEP, sanctions and adverse media screening
continuous monitoring and change detection
structured follow-up and approvals
evidence and audit trail
The initial review establishes who you are dealing with. Ongoing monitoring helps ensure that picture stays current throughout the relationship.
IQON does not attempt to model procurement rules or public-administration frameworks. Those live in your own systems and your own policy.
What IQON provides is the due-diligence layer underneath: the screening, the ownership picture, the structured review and the record of what was decided.